The results of this case-study show that even with a
minimal planning effort, planned harvesting as applied at the study site on
sample unit Plot/02 is economically and environmentally superior to conventional
logging as commonly practiced in Suriname.
On this study, the labour cost associated with planned harvesting was 20%
lower than that associated with conventional logging, even though a larger
initial labour investment was required to do the pre-harvest inventory and tree
mapping. Furthermore, planned forest harvesting has the significant advantage of
meeting not only short-term but also medium and long-term economic and
environmental objectives. These advantages become clear through a comparison of
characteristics of the two systems:
|
Conventional logging |
? |
Planned harvesting |
| c |
? |
? |
|
Timber losses in total came to 15.7% of the total volume cut at the felling
site, mainly due to poor felling and bucking. |
? |
Directional felling by trained operators would substantially reduce timber
losses during felling and bucking operations. |
| ? |
? |
? |
|
Timber losses due to lost logs amounted to about 5% of the total volume cut
by felling operations. |
? |
Lost logs are eliminated due to the use of the tree location map during
felling and skidding operations. |
| ? |
? |
? |
|
Depletion of timber resources in the vicinity of the few established roads
that provide access to the forest. |
? |
Pre-harvest survey and a proper recording system permit timber removals to be
controlled and monitored in order to avoid depletion of timber resources and
disappearance of rare species. |
Focusing on environmental impacts of harvesting operations, advantages of
planned forest harvesting include the following:
|
Conventional logging |
|
Planned harvesting |
| |
|
|
|
Randomly distributed non-harvested forest areas remain due to difficult site
conditions rather than to considerations of preservation. |
|
A general inventory during the exploration phase provides basic information
about timber resources in the area but also serves zoning purposes (e.g.,
setting aside areas for reasons of preservation). |
| |
|
|
|
Unrestricted timber removal can lead to the disappearance of certain tree
species associated with a loss in diversity of forests. |
|
A pre-harvest survey helps to determine the proper level of AAC and identify
the need for restricting the felling of certain species, in order to assuring
the continued existence of rare species. |
| |
|
|
|
Undiscovered internal decay was responsible for 7.8% in timber
losses. |
|
Reliable decay investigation prior to felling should be part of planned
harvesting in order to prevent timber losses caused by internal
decay. |
| |
|
|
|
Unreliable rot identification causes unnecessary felling of trees, increasing
environmental impacts. |
|
Trees suspected of having internal decay are not felled, but preserved as
shade and seed trees in order to diminish environmental impacts. |
| |
|
|
|
Neighbouring trees are unnecessarily damaged during felling operation by
interconnecting vines. |
|
Climber cutting, done well in advance of harvesting, enables directional
felling and helps to reduce felling damage. |
| |
|
|
|
The area affected by primary skidtrails came to 12.4% of the sample unit
area, not even taking into account a criss-crossing network of secondary
skidtrails caused by unplanned searching for and skidding of logs. |
|
Soil disturbance associated with soil compaction remains restricted to the
areas of designated skidtrails, which covered about 5.4% of the area harvested
on the planned harvesting trial. |
These medium and long-term advantages of planned forest harvesting operations
in producing tropical forest products are confirmed by similar studies (Elias
1998, Winkler 1997).
Conventional logging as commonly practiced in Suriname can be characterised
as poorly planned, haphazard timber harvesting without inadequate consideration
for future crops and forest sustainability. Nevertheless, the replacement of
conventional logging by environmentally sound forest harvesting systems is not
likely to be achieved overnight. As a first step towards sustainable forest
management, the existing potential for improving harvesting operations should be
fully utilised. This would, however, require planning and the enforcement of
existing laws and regulations (e.g., the Forest Management Act of
1992).
|
Topic |
|
Requirements and measures to be undertaken |
| |
|
|
|
Exploration phase |
|
An exploration phase is required according to FMA 1992 before a concession
application can be submitted:
B7 Once enforced, the results of the exploratory inventory will not only
provide preliminary information for strategic planning but also serve zoning
purposes as part of overall forest management planning and a component of
comprehensive land-use planning. |
| |
|
|
|
Forest inventory requirement |
|
New concession agreements normally include inventory requirements:
?/STRONG> Once implemented, inventory results will provide for the
AAC to be set at a level that provides the maximum harvest volume while ensuring
that the prospects for future harvests do not deteriorate.
?/STRONG> Determination of the AAC based on the area and the length
of the concession agreement is to be replaced. |
| |
|
|
|
Demarcation of "blocks" |
|
SBB's policy is to define management units, often referred to as "blocks", of
100-500 ha:
?Once implemented, this will permit a transportation system
to be designed for the entire concession area with roads being constructed when
access to an individual "block" is required. |
| |
|
|
|
Stock survey |
|
New concession agreements do include stock survey requirements and SBB's
policy is to introduce a pre-harvesting 100% stock survey as obligatory
condition for the issuing of concessions:
?In implementing the stock survey requirement, the blocks
are to be divided into administrative units, often referred to as "cutting
units," that can be easily identified on the ground and used to help control and
guide harvesting operations. |
| |
|
|
|
Tree location map |
|
SBB's policy on the 100% pre-harvest stock survey also includes the
requirement to map the cutting unit:
?/STRONG> All trees that might be harvestable are marked on the map
along with all other features that might influence harvesting operations
(e.g., swampy areas).
?Such tree location maps should, however, not only serve
planning purposes but are to be used by the felling and skidding crews to
increase efficiency of operations and reduce wood waste. |
| |
|
|
|
Design of skidtrails |
|
? In easy terrain when cutting units are contiguous, the
planning of the skidtrail system should be done simultaneously for all units
(e.g., regular pattern of straight skidtrails at certain distances).
?If cutting units are not contiguous, individual plans are
required at the level of a cutting unit or a group of units.
?The skidtrail system must be laid out so that it
efficiently accesses the trees to be harvested taking account of problem areas
(e.g., swamps) while at the same time minimising the total length of
skidtrails.
?/STRONG> Skidtrails should generally be as straight as possible,
curving where necessary to reach timber marked for cutting or to avoid wet soils
and other obstacles, but avoiding tight corners in order to prevent damage to
trees standing near the skidtrail. |
| |
|
|
|
Tagging and recording |
|
SBB/LBB monitors the log transport and the concessionaires are obliged to
keep a logging register and to tag each log for tracking:
?However, the tagging of logs should be done at the felling
site so that the concessionaire can be charged not only for the timber removed
from the area but actually cut on the area.
?Thus the concessionaire would have an interest in removing
all trees cut and would thereby tend to reduce wood waste. |
| |
|
|
|
Database on concessions
with SBB |
|
?The database established by SBB should be developed as a
kind of "management" tool rather than a purely statistical tool.
?All information on inventory results and timber removals
available at the lowest management level (ideally the cutting unit level) should
be stored for easy retrieval in order to identify problem areas where concession
agreements might not be renewed or timber harvest should be restricted to
selected species or certain cutting units, to avoid depletion of timber
resources. |
| |
|
|
|
Payment systems |
|
?As a first step, the current piece-rate payment system for
felling should be reconsidered by the concessionaires, who would profit by
moving from payments based on the number of trees cut to a payment based on
volume of timber cut per day. This would encourage chainsaw operators to cut
mature trees rather than small trees which should be left to form the future
crop to be harvested during the next harvest entry.
?A logical second step would be the introduction of a
"mixed" payment system involving a base hourly wage that would be supplemented
by payment on a piece rate basis (per cubic metre) once the timber production
passes a certain threshold. In such a system the chainsaw operator would be
encouraged to cut mature trees and to carry out reliable decay investigations
(e.g., making a probing cut with the chainsaw blade into each tree
selected for harvesting where internal decay is suspected) in order to avoid
wasting time by cutting those trees. |
| |
|
|
|
Forest harvesting workforce |
|
?Training for workers at all levels, but in particular
chainsaw operators, should be a high priority in order to enable them to do
their job efficiently and safely.
?Training of the felling crews would permit wood residues
related to wasteful felling and bucking practices to be reduced
substantially. |
First steps are being taken, but much remains to be done. A high priority
should be placed on efforts to promote the implementation of environmentally
sound forest harvesting systems throughout Suriname in order to bring forest
harvesting into compliance with the objectives of sustainable forest
management. |