Software:
Links:
|
| reduce expenses is through more efficient inventory monitoring |
|
|
Manufacturers know that MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Operating) expenses can be
some of the largest expenses the company records. After all, keeping complex but
critical machinery up and running safely and properly is no easy task in the
modern factory. What most manufacturers don't know, however, is that there's a
good chance that these companies could cut some of those expenses and could
actually end up saving money on their MRO needs.
Excessive MRO costs are
often caused by a number of issues. First, is the tendency of workers to
stockpile maintenance or repair materials for future use outside of the main
inventory. They do this for their own convenience, so they'll be assured that
those materials are available when and if they need them. However, since those
goods no longer appear in the inventory, they are being reordered even when
enough of them are actually still unused.
Another cause of MRO waste is
inefficient purchasing strategies. In many manufacturing firms, the person or
persons responsible for placing MRO orders are the people who use those goods
themselves. The end result is that people in different departments end up
ordering the same materials. Plus, the MRO employee ends up spending their
valuable time dealing with vendors instead of maintaining the equipment.
Finally, MRO costs are often exaggerated because of their Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) systems. When companies implement their ERPs, they often
feel that it will be the big solution they've waited for. Unfortunately, if the
ERP modules related to MRO procurement are not properly configured or if the MRO
employees are not properly trained on how to make use of the system, then
problems and excess costs can result.
While the extra expenses these
problems add to MRO budgets vary from company to company, all manufacturers can
find ways to reduce these expenses effectively. For example, financial leverage
can be an asset to MRO budgets if all purchasing goes through a central
department instead of being spread out through the entire factory and/or
different plant locations. If one department orders 200 pairs of goggles and
another department in a different plant orders 300 pairs of goggles, they will
pay a higher fee per pair than if both orders were combined. Another way for
manufacturers to save money is through improved materials management. Instead of
allowing employees unlimited access to the MRO goods so that stockpiling becomes
a possibility, the company needs to implement strategies to prevent employees
from removing more of these items from the inventory than what are actually
needed. Employees may resist such changes, but if inventory levels are
maintained consistently, the need for stockpiling becomes a dead issue.
There are additional areas where MRO savings can also be generated.
First, manufacturers can determine which of their MRO goods have a short life
span and can find an alternative with a longer life cycle. This change alone can
cut costs significantly. Another method to reduce expenses is through more
efficient inventory monitoring. With supply chain software implemented, vendors
can track the amount of MRO goods a company has in stock so that they can ship
them when necessary.
One of the most effective ways to reduce MRO
expenditures is to choose an effective supply chain partner. Some vendors simply
are not willing to or capable of getting on board with innovative supply chain
management objectives. These sellers end up costing manufacturers more in the
long run. Before choosing a vendor with whom to collaborate; therefore, the
manufacturer needs to carefully examine the seller and lay out a plan for their
joint work. Questions about quality certification, current technology, and price
mark ups should be discussed before any supply chain agreements are finalized.
The bottom line is that no manufacturer needs to put up with wasteful
MRO spending. A few changes in procurement strategy can cut costs and improve
profit margins significantly. |
| |
|
|
|
|