Software:
Links:
|
| Inventory and Assessment of K-12 and Professional Teacher Development Programs |
|
|
The National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) is ideally suited to
offer unique opportunities to the K-12 and professional teacher development
(PTD) market. Educational programming linked to research and stewardship was
incorporated at the Reserves from NERRS' inception in 1972. Currently
twenty-four Reserves are offering K-12 and PTD to a wide range of
audiences.
In 2002-2003 NERRS Educators
identified that a K-12 and PTD inventory and assessment project was a high
priority action item. It would provide baseline data, synthesis, and
recommendations for program improvements in support of the NERRS Strategic Plan.
In September of 2002, Pandion Systems was contracted to complete the project
with the following study objectives:
- An inventory and assessment, both quantitative and
qualitative, of current programming for K-12 and professional teacher
development (PTD) across the 25 Reserves and how these programs integrate state
and national standards.
- Recommendations for improved program evaluation and
performance measurement.
- Recommendations for improving program design and
implementation, as well as needs for national-level support and capacity
building activity.
- Recommendations and associated implications for a
national “niche” or system-wide program or activity in the areas of K-12
education and professional teacher development.
In order to meet the project objectives, various data
collection methods were used. Initially, three on-line surveys were administered
to various staff members. The Education Coordinators (ECs) answered two online
surveys: a general survey that collected data on their entire K-12 and PTD
program and an individual program survey that collected specific data on each
current K-12 and PTD program. The Reserve Managers (RMs), Research Coordinators
(RCs), and Stewardship Coordinators (SCs) answered a survey that collected data
about communication at each Reserve and about support for K-12 and PTD education
programs.
After the data was collected from
the online surveys, a follow-up survey for the ECs was designed and implemented
through in-depth telephone interviews and four site visits. The open-ended
questions were designed to clarify answers given in online surveys and to seek
in-depth information for specific project objectives. The inventory data from
the online individual survey was compiled into an accessible database format for
future use by the Reserves and the NERRS national office. In addition, the data
was compiled and analyzed.
The Survey
revealed some very interesting results. Some of the more fascinating and
important results are outlined below.
General Information
- 84% of the Reserves have an educational
facility.
- 92% of the Reserves have one or more full-time
education employees.
- 46% of the Reserves spend a large amount of time
running K-12 programs.
- 83% of the Reserves spend a small amount of time
running PTD programs.
- ECs spend 54% of their time on other responsibilities
versus K-12 and PTD responsibilities.
K-12 Programs
- Approximately 66,000 to 67,000 students participated in
K-12 programs in 2002.
- The most common K-12 program topics are estuary biology
and ecology, human impacts on estuaries (including land use), and citizen
stewardship.
- Sixth through eighth grades are the most common target
audience for K-12 programs, followed by fourth and fifth grade.
- 51% of Reserves partnered with other organizations to
deliver K-12 programs.
- 91% of K-12 programs use internal budget money to fund
K-12 programs.
- The most common methods of program evaluation are staff
observation and tracking participant attendance figures.
PTD Programs
- Approximately 1,800 to 2,000 teachers participated in
PTD programs in 2002.
- The most common PTD program topics are estuary biology
and ecology, human impacts on estuaries (including land use), and
chemical/physical/geological sciences.
- Sixth through eighth grade teachers are the most common
target audience for PTD programs, followed by high school teachers, and fourth
and fifth grade teachers.
- 84% of Reserves use part of their internal budget and
53% use partners to help fund PTD programs.
- The most common methods of PTD program evaluation are
staff observation, tracking participant attendance figures, and feedback
cards.
After synthesizing and analyzing the data, the results
were categorized into areas based on the study objectives: Program Design and
Implementation; National and State Educational Standards; Program Evaluation and
Performance Measurement; National or System-Wide Program or Activity; and
Capacity Building.
Program Design and
Implementation Several study questions
identify target audience selection and internal and external influences that
shape K-12 and PTD. Target audience selection differs for K-12 and PTD programs.
For K-12 programs, target audience selection is determined by the group’s
flexibility to attend a program. PTD target audience selection is determined in
two ways: 1) providing half-day or full-day trainings for teachers who bring
their students to the Reserve, and 2) targeting specific grade levels for longer
workshops that give teachers specific estuarine science and conservation
knowledge. For both K-12 and PTD the most common external influences are
frequency of requests and inclusion in a Reserve initiative. ECs say that the
internal influences that shape program design and implementation are physical
facilities, time of year a Reserve can offer a program, and the remoteness of
the Reserve location.
National and
State Educational Standards Throughout
the country, Reserves report that it is increasingly difficult to have students
and teachers visit the Reserve if they do not correlate programs to state
standards. Currently, 57% of K-12 programs are correlated to state standards and
67% of PTD programs are correlated to state standards. When correlating programs
to state standards, the preferred method is to develop the program first and
then match it to corresponding standards. Most programs are not correlated to
national standards, which is not surprising because school systems are
ultimately held accountable to state standards.
Program Evaluation and Performance
Measurement Little formal evaluation
occurs for K-12 and PTD programs. The most common form of evaluation is staff
observation and tracking participant attendance figures. Thirty-one percent of
the K-12 programs reports having no formal evaluation and only a quarter of the
programs have any type of follow-up surveys, pre- and post-program surveys, or
feedback cards. For PTD programs, 22% of the programs have no formal evaluation
and less than half have follow-up surveys, pre and post surveys, or feedback
cards.
National or System-Wide Program
or Activity In general, there is support
for some form of a system-wide program or activity. Around 60% of ECs agree that
system-wide NERRS education objectives, educational program(s), and curriculum
would help them improve educational programs at their Reserve. However, the
support is mixed because there are contrasting opinions. ECs do agree that if
any national program is implemented, it should be flexible and well supported
with a long term commitment, adequate funding, and central
coordination.
ECs indicated that a
national-level NERRS curriculum or program might include:
- Introductory materials that each Reserve could use as
springboard for site-specific programs
- Creative national marketing strategies that highlight
commonalities in programs and focus among Reserves
- National PTD certification program
- National goals and objectives
- Comprehensive and Integrated
- Website
- Evaluation tools and methods
Capacity Building Capacity building is defined as any activity or resource that
might assist the K-12 and PTD programs. This includes strengthening
partnerships, program support, communication, funding, and
training.
Partnerships are used by Reserves
in several major ways: to gain or share resources, to build programs, and to
build relationships. Fifty-six percent of ECs use partnerships to gain or share
resources for funding (for program salaries), people (staff, volunteers),
facilities, (classrooms, dorms), equipment (canoes, boats, lab materials),
education or training materials, time, audience mailing lists, and
transportation services.
Reserve Managers are
generally supportive of ECs, and allow the autonomy of ECs to manage their own
areas of responsibility. ECs feel that increased communication with RCs would
improve education programs. It was found that the Reserve staff at each site is
small and the workload is great, so it is often easy for staff to become
narrowly focused on their area. Communication between staff occurs at all of the
sites, but in many cases only when a specific need arises.
Several questions probed ECs greatest needs for funding and
training. Funding is needed for more paid education staff to assist with
programs, teacher stipends, and transportation. The greatest training needs for
EC professional development include training for program evaluation, education
standards correlations, curriculum design, and to increase ecological knowledge
and skills.
A key outcome of the project was
to provide recommendations to improve NERRS K-12 and PTD programs. NERRS is a
unique organization with many strengths. NERRS’ mission, structure, and
diversity give it the potential to be a leader in estuarine education on a
national level. With this in mind, the following recommendations were
developed.
Reserve Level
Recommendations
Recommendation
1: Develop an EC position description The EC position description should include some broad
qualifications and duties that can be integrated with Reserve-specific
qualifications and responsibilities. This could be used as a guide to create
consistency across the network.
Recommendation 2: Provide training for
ECs The creation of an annual development
plan for each EC that builds on their key strengths and identifies areas for
further development would help each EC to increase their expertise in both
estuarine science and education. ECs should be proactive to determine specific
professional development opportunities for themselves and present a proposal to
their RM so that they can expand their professional
capabilities.
Recommendation 3:
Increase paid education staff The education
staff has many program responsibilities including CTP, Coastal Decision Makers
Workshops, school programs, and public programs. In addition, ECs have
administrative and overall operations responsibilities that take over half of
their time. ECs need more staff to run safer programs and to increase program
attendance. It is important to identify the Reserves that need more staff and
determine if it can be pursued on a federal or state level.
Recommendation 4: Secure outside funding for K-12 and
PTD programs Over 84% of all K-12 and PTD
programs are funded by internal budgets. ECs indicate they need assistance in
finding outside funding to increase or improve current Reserve
programs.
National Level
Recommendations
Recommendation 5:
Hire a national K-12 and PTD education coordinator; secure direct and
consistent funding for any new system-wide K-12 and PTD
programming If there is a commitment to K-12
and PTD programs from a system-wide standpoint, a central coordinator position
needs to be established. The coordinator would take the leadership role on any
national or system-wide program(s), including an evaluation and performance
measurement framework.
Recommendation
6: Provide assistance to Reserves to secure outside
funding The national office or national
education coordinator could serve as a repository for a catalog of funding
opportunities. The national Education Coordinator could serve as the lead in
writing proposals for grants to other federal agencies such as the Environmental
Protection Agency and the National Science Foundation, as well as to private
funding sources.
Recommendation 7:
Maintain a database of examples of NERRS K-12 and PTD
programs Maintaining a database of examples
of successful NERRS K-12 and PTD programs and “lessons learned” is more
manageable and sustainable with today’s technology. The database could be stored
on a NERRS K-12 and PTD website for ECs. A separate website for the public could
help market the programs.
Recommendation 8: Provide assistance to correlate all
NERRS programs to state educational standards Although ECs can be trained to correlate programs to state
standards themselves, their workload prevents this from being a high priority.
Correlating programs and curricula to state standards will increase the
likelihood that educators will use the materials, come to PTD trainings, and
bring their students to Reserve K-12 programs. Assistance might include training
and/or assistance performing correlations.
Recommendation 9: Establish national performance
measures and Reserve-level goals and objectives The national office, with EC input, should develop key national
goals that are important and applicable throughout NERRS, and then tie them to
measurable objectives. At the Reserve level, the national office should assist
with the development of goals and objectives that would relate to each
particular Reserve’s target audiences. The objectives could be knowledge,
attitude, or action based. The Reserves could mirror state benchmarks or
standards for their objectives.
Recommendation 10: Develop and implement an evaluation
framework that would measure factors at a national level and Reserve
level There is no established evaluation
framework at the national level and only a few Reserves consistently evaluate
their programs. It is important that Reserves define the level and types of
formal evaluation that would be most useful and that ECs create an efficient and
consistent plan to evaluate their programs.
Recommendation 11: Provide assistance for a K-12 and
PTD market analysis and needs assessment for newer Reserves or Reserves
interested in re-assessing their programs A
market analysis and needs assessment would assist Reserves in the development of
effective programs, the development of an evaluation and performance measurement
framework, and participation in a system-wide program.
Recommendation 12: Provide assistance for a PTD market
analysis and needs assessment for Reserves that offer or want to offer PTD
programs A market analysis and needs
assessment would assist Reserves that offer PTD programs in the development of
effective programs, the development of an evaluation and performance measurement
framework, and teacher recruitment.
Recommendation 13: Continue national marketing to
support local K-12 and PTD initiatives ECs
want more marketing materials to supplement their programs or market any
system-wide program. There is also a desire for a central NERRS K-12 and PTD
website that could be a link among Reserve programs and any national
program.
Recommendation 14: Develop and offer a system-wide
NERRS K-12 and PTD program focused on field-based estuarine
research Many Reserve educational initiatives
already integrate Reserve research and a majority of ECs (96%) indicate that
research is a differentiating factor for their K-12 and PTD programs. There are
many organizations doing coastal and marine K-12 and PTD education, but few of
them are filling an estuarine education niche with a research focus. It makes
sense that field-based estuarine research be the focus for a system-wide K-12
and PTD program.
|
| |
|
|
|
|